Legal AI with a source-checking gate.
Draft, research, and summarize in a workspace your firm controls. A separate review step checks consequential citations and record references, holds what it cannot verify, and leaves the legal judgment to you.
Review the sample →Your cloud account · attorney review required · compatibility confirmed before setup.
Fabricated authority is a preventable professional risk.
Courts have sanctioned lawyers for filings that included AI-generated cases and quotations that did not exist. The lesson is not to avoid AI; it is to require a documented verification step before relying on its work.
That verification step is the center of this product. A separate reviewer checks cited authority against an available source and holds anything it cannot verify. The result is a review trail—not a substitute for Shepardizing, KeyCiting, or attorney judgment.
How a cite clears the gate
An agent drafts the memo and cites its authorities. Fast, thorough — and, on its own, fallible.
A separate reviewer checks each authority against its source. Different engine, one job: is it grounded, and does it say what's claimed?
Unverifiable cites are blocked and listed, never hidden. You get a verified-authority table and a could-not-verify list.
You read, decide, and sign. The judgment stays yours; the receipt is on file.
Three governed packs, one focused practice.
Each pack produces a draft plus a review trail for the consequential citations, facts, or record references it is configured to check.
Litigation Support
Deposition and record summaries, indexed by legal element with page:line cites; privilege-waiver audits.
Legal Drafting
Demand letters, discovery, and correspondence, drafted from your templates and playbook. Tracked-changes out.
Legal Research
Issue in, a cited memo out — with a checked-authority table and a could-not-verify list.
How it works
We scope access first, configure the workspace with you, then test a representative workflow before client use.
We set up your workspace
A short screen-shared session: a private AI workspace in your own cloud, no-training terms verified, your templates and playbook wired in.
The packs do the work
Draft, research, summarize — and the reviewer checks anything consequential against the record before it reaches you.
You read, sign, and file
A verified draft out, with its citations checked and its facts traced. The judgment — and the signature — stays yours.
Compatibility is confirmed before you commit.
We review the tools you rely on, the access your subscriptions permit, and the available API, connector, or MCP path. We only promise a connection after that check; vendor approval and plan restrictions can apply.
Research services
Westlaw, Lexis, and citator access depends on your subscription, vendor terms, and an approved technical path. We confirm what is available before including it in scope.
Case and document systems
Practice-management, document, court, and email systems can be assessed for authorized access. A connection is tested with non-confidential material before matter use.
Custom compatibility review
If no maintained connector exists, we assess the API and security model. Custom work, vendor approval, or a narrower workflow may be required.
Credentials and permissions
Connections use credentials and permissions your firm authorizes. The final data-flow diagram records each service involved and where processing occurs.
Know where matter data is processed.
Your firm controls the workspace and authorizes each connected service. Matter content may be transmitted from that workspace to Anthropic and any connector you enable under those providers' terms. Legal Skills HQ documents the path and scopes support access; it does not claim that cloud processing keeps files only on your device.
Documented architecture
Your implementation record identifies hosting, model, connectors, credentials, logs, retention settings, and any support-access path.
Training terms checked
Before matter use, we confirm the selected Anthropic account or API terms state how submitted content is used. Terms can change and should be reviewed periodically.
Attorney review remains mandatory
Checks reduce verification work; they do not establish accuracy, current validity, privilege, or legal sufficiency. You review and approve each consequential output.
Governance packet
You receive a draft AI-use policy, tool inventory, and plain-language data-flow diagram to adapt with your ethics, security, and insurance advisers.
One firm, one price.
Flat monthly pricing includes the configured workflow packs and guided setup. Your firm separately pays its cloud, model, research-service, and connector costs; those costs vary with usage and vendor terms.
- All three governed packs — Research, Drafting, Litigation Support
- Source checks on configured consequential citations and record references
- Compatibility assessment for requested research, case, and email systems
- A private AI workspace in your own cloud
- Concierge setup — your templates and playbook wired in
- The carrier-ready governance packet
Cancel anytime; your workspace and files stay yours.
Discuss Solo Already reviewed the workflow? Subscribe directly.- Everything in Solo, across your whole practice
- Multi-matter workspaces and shared firm templates
- Priority concierge setup and onboarding
- Firm-wide AI-use policy and tool inventory
- A named point of contact for your account
Cancel anytime; your workspace and files stay yours.
Discuss Firm Already reviewed the workflow? Subscribe directly.The first-session guarantee. We agree on one representative workflow before the session. If the configured workflow cannot produce a usable draft and review trail from the agreed test material, tell us during the session and we will refund the first subscription payment. Third-party fees are excluded.
Not sure which fits? Book a 15-minute walkthrough before you subscribe.
Frequently asked questions
Is this legal advice?
No. Legal Skills HQ is a productivity tool for licensed attorneys. It does not provide legal advice, does not create an attorney–client relationship, and is not a substitute for the judgment of a licensed attorney. Every output is a draft for your review, and you sign it.
How do you keep the AI from inventing citations?
A separate reviewer checks every cited authority and holds anything it can't verify against a source — listed for you, never quietly included. For work grounded in your own documents (deposition summaries, drafts from your files), it confirms each cite resolves to the record. For open research, it checks each authority against the research services you've connected — Westlaw, Lexis, or a citator, if you've wired them in — and flags anything it still can't ground, so nothing unverified is passed off as confirmed. You remain responsible for confirming current validity before you file.
Can it connect to Westlaw, Lexis, or my case-management system?
Yes. Your box runs on the same connector and MCP standards Claude already uses, so it works with the tools you already subscribe to — authorized with your own credentials, inside your own workspace. Connect your research service and citations are checked against it; connect your document or case system and drafts start from your matter. If something you use doesn't have a ready connector, we wire it up during setup — you won't hear "we don't integrate with that" from us.
Does the AI train on my client documents?
No. Verifying no-training terms is a required setup step before your first real matter — either a commercial API key, which excludes training by contract, or a verified subscription opt-out.
Where does my data actually go?
Your firm selects content in its cloud workspace. The configured workflow may send that content to Anthropic and enabled connectors under your accounts and their applicable terms. We document those processors, logs, retention settings, permissions, and any support-access path before matter use.
What does it cost?
Solo is $500 a month for one attorney; Firm is $1,500 a month for a practice of two to twenty. Both include guided setup and the configured workflow packs. Cloud, model, research-service, and connector costs are paid separately and vary by usage and vendor terms.
Do I need to know how to code?
No. Setup is a short screen-shared session where we configure everything — your templates, your playbook, your no-training terms — so your first checked document is ready in that same session.
Review the workflow with us.
In a 15-minute walkthrough, we will examine the sample review trail, discuss the work you want to test, and identify the systems and permissions that need a compatibility check. No client documents are needed for this call.
- → See how unresolved citations and record references are surfaced
- → Leave with a clear answer on fit, dependencies, and next steps
Who you’ll meet: Steve Kaplan, operator of Legal Skills HQ through GTMVP Inc. This is a product and implementation discussion, not legal or ethics advice.
No spam, no sharing your details. One email to book your time.